<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Francisco May Regulate Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/</link>
	<description>News, plugins and themes for blogging applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Scandalize My Name  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Do you want your blog regulated?</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4402</link>
		<dc:creator>Scandalize My Name  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Do you want your blog regulated?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 04:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4402</guid>
		<description>[...]  on a law that would require bloggers to be registered.  Crazy!  See the links below: 	See Streets of San Francisco Blogging  Published in:Post &#124;on  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  on a law that would require bloggers to be registered.  Crazy!  See the links below: 	See Streets of San Francisco Blogging  </p>
<p>Published in:<br />
Post |<br />
on  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustSue.ca &#187; The Ghost of Well-Intentioned Exercise Purchases Past</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4399</link>
		<dc:creator>JustSue.ca &#187; The Ghost of Well-Intentioned Exercise Purchases Past</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4399</guid>
		<description>[...] exercise on - yoga&#8217;s just not my bag. I prefer to be moving quickly while I sweat). 	PS&#8230; WTF is with this?  	  	                         	   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exercise on &#8211; yoga&#8217;s just not my bag. I prefer to be moving quickly while I sweat). 	PS&#8230; WTF is with this?  	  	                         	   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mangas Verdes &#187; San Francisco regula la blogosfera</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4389</link>
		<dc:creator>Mangas Verdes &#187; San Francisco regula la blogosfera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 08:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4389</guid>
		<description>[...] 	Archivado en: Política, Universo Blog, Ciberderechos &#8212; mmeida @ 8:50 am  	 	 			Son varias fuentes ya las que inciden en la misma inquietud: el C [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 	Archivado en: Política, Universo Blog, Ciberderechos &#8212; mmeida @ 8:50 am  	 	 			Son varias fuentes ya las que inciden en la misma inquietud: el C [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave M.</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4384</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4384</guid>
		<description>After going through the city ordinance, I don&#039;t really see anything in it that talks about bloggers having to report anything. It sounds more like the candidate that requests being posted on a blog has to report it. It mentions the internet, but that probably means a site like johnkerry.com.

The guy who you got the info from seemed to be misquoting the ordinance, and certainly made it more confusing than the ordinance. Though, the ordinance is certainly confusing in it&#039;s own right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After going through the city ordinance, I don&#8217;t really see anything in it that talks about bloggers having to report anything. It sounds more like the candidate that requests being posted on a blog has to report it. It mentions the internet, but that probably means a site like johnkerry.com.</p>
<p>The guy who you got the info from seemed to be misquoting the ordinance, and certainly made it more confusing than the ordinance. Though, the ordinance is certainly confusing in it&#8217;s own right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RustIndy</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4383</link>
		<dc:creator>RustIndy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4383</guid>
		<description>The bill only applies to election-related blogs, not everyone&#039;s blog. Read the bill/article/law/whatever before posting over-zealous hype, please :) The very first page of the PDF that BlogTyme links to (well, the very first page full of text, anyways) specifies that the bill and everything within it are specific to &quot;electioneering communications&quot; within the media specified in the bill - blogging is being added to it because it has been previously in the gray area. It already applies to radio, television, advertising, and traditional media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bill only applies to election-related blogs, not everyone&#8217;s blog. Read the bill/article/law/whatever before posting over-zealous hype, please <img src='http://www.bloggingpro.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  The very first page of the PDF that BlogTyme links to (well, the very first page full of text, anyways) specifies that the bill and everything within it are specific to &#8220;electioneering communications&#8221; within the media specified in the bill &#8211; blogging is being added to it because it has been previously in the gray area. It already applies to radio, television, advertising, and traditional media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave&#8217;s Chalkboard &#187; San Francisco May Regulate Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4382</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave&#8217;s Chalkboard &#187; San Francisco May Regulate Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 01:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4382</guid>
		<description>[...]   				Filed under: News,  WTF!?,  Political 		Tags: wtf, news, blogging, political, fec  		San Francisco May Regulate Bloggi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   				Filed under: News,  WTF!?,  Political 		Tags: wtf, news, blogging, political, fec  		San Francisco May Regulate Bloggi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Apathy &#187; Â  San Francisco May Regulate BloggingÂ byÂ Blogging Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4381</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Apathy &#187; Â  San Francisco May Regulate BloggingÂ byÂ Blogging Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 01:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2005/04/04/san-francisco-may-regulate-blogging/#comment-4381</guid>
		<description>[...]  			April 4, 2005 			Â  San Francisco May Regulate BloggingÂ byÂ Blogging Pro 			 					Â  San Francisco May Regulate BloggingÂ byÂ Blogging Pro 	I d [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]<br />
 			April 4, 2005<br />
 			Â  San Francisco May Regulate BloggingÂ byÂ Blogging Pro</p>
<p> 					Â  San Francisco May Regulate BloggingÂ byÂ Blogging Pro 	I d [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

