Performancing Metrics

Blog Censorship Gains Support

Most Americans believe bloggers should not be allowed to publish sensitive personal information about individuals, according to a new survey.

Web hosting company Hostway this week released the results of its poll of 2,500 respondents on blogging. Eighty percent of respondents did not believe that bloggers should be allowed to publish home addresses and other personal information about private citizens.

A further 72 percent favored censorship of personal information about celebrities, and 68 percent information about elected or appointed government officials such as judges or mayors.

However, more than one-third of respondents had never heard of blogs before participating in the survey, and only around 30 percent of participants had actually visited a blog themselves.


Categories: Blogging News


Comments

  1. Denis de Bernardy says: 4/14/2005

    This story reminds me of a slashdot entry on e-scrabble. It is irrelevant: If a country or a hosting company censors your celeb zoo porn blog, spare yourself trouble and host it elsewhere.

  2. Faisal says: 4/14/2005

    The web will never be censored.

    [knock on wood]

  3. Mike Little says: 4/14/2005

    Since when did 2,500 Hostway visitors represent the views of 293 million Americans?
    To extrapolate ‘Most Americans’ from 2000 respondants is laughable!
    None of this is any different from the laws concerning (and I should imagine peoples general opinion of) any other form of publishing.
    It’s a non story backed by some dubious numbers!

  4. Andy Skelton says: 4/14/2005

    I wouldn’t call that ‘censorship gaining support’. It’s bad enough c|net uses exaggerated shock-media titles for news entries; you don’t have to follow suit.

  5. Zo says: 4/14/2005

    Wouldn’t blogging be boring if you could expose people & then proceed to make fun of them?! Seriously.

  6. Jon says: 4/15/2005

    How many people would want others to put your address or “other personal information” on their blog? I wouldn’t. I rarely even put my last name on the internet.

  7. Richard says: 4/16/2005

    A further 72 percent favored censorship of personal information about celebrities, and 68 percent information about elected or appointed government officials such as judges or mayors. I wonder if that ‘personal information’ that 2/3 uninformed respondents would like to see limited would include alleged verfiable ciations for jusdicial misconduct? I’d like to see how the questions were framed … there’s a reason polling left to experts. For instance, if they asked about ’sensitive persoanl information,’ wouldn’t you say that’s slightly skewing the results? I’d respond that *sensitive* inforamtion shouldn’t be posted, myself. But that’s not the same as ‘no information,’ and in the cases of judges and elected officials, I most certainly believe the public’s right to know outweighs their personal privacy insofar as it impacts their conduct or job performance.