<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress.com Adds Custom CSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/</link>
	<description>News, plugins and themes for blogging applications</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Minimology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apps and Companies that have impressed and/or surprised in 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/#comment-108516</link>
		<dc:creator>Minimology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apps and Companies that have impressed and/or surprised in 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/#comment-108516</guid>
		<description>[...] I was quite astonished when I heard that Automattic had gotten funding this year, in my mind they were all about an open source piece of blogging software. However, I overlooked their premium services such as Akismet. This year they&#8217;ve really exploited the growing demand for blogging in business and have tailored several entrerprise level services towards this market. They&#8217;ve also been able to make use of the house-hold-name the open source release of wordpress has gotten in order to grab customers. They&#8217;ve introduced premium features such as template customisation into their hosted service, however I think there&#8217;ll be stiff competition in 2007. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was quite astonished when I heard that Automattic had gotten funding this year, in my mind they were all about an open source piece of blogging software. However, I overlooked their premium services such as Akismet. This year they&#8217;ve really exploited the growing demand for blogging in business and have tailored several entrerprise level services towards this market. They&#8217;ve also been able to make use of the house-hold-name the open source release of wordpress has gotten in order to grab customers. They&#8217;ve introduced premium features such as template customisation into their hosted service, however I think there&#8217;ll be stiff competition in 2007. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd D Budd</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/#comment-37771</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd D Budd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/#comment-37771</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I just worry that people are quickly going to get sick of paying $1 here, $15 there to get features for their WordPress.com blog that are 100% free with WordPress.org.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think Matt and team have done an amazing thing &lt;a href="http://www.foolswisdom.com/~lloyd/wordpress/index.php/wordpress-export-and-wordcamp/" rel="nofollow"&gt;by protecting my ability to leave WordPress.com&lt;/a&gt; . I trust these guy.

Aside, I learnt today that strike is not XHTML ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I just worry that people are quickly going to get sick of paying $1 here, $15 there to get features for their WordPress.com blog that are 100% free with WordPress.org.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think Matt and team have done an amazing thing <a href="http://www.foolswisdom.com/~lloyd/wordpress/index.php/wordpress-export-and-wordcamp/" rel="nofollow">by protecting my ability to leave WordPress.com</a> . I trust these guy.</p>
<p>Aside, I learnt today that strike is not XHTML <img src='http://www.bloggingpro.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jefte</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/#comment-35090</link>
		<dc:creator>Jefte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/#comment-35090</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite="Matt"&gt;You can edit the CSS on all themes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow. Only a few years later... and at an expense! I heartily laugh at this lame-duck attempt to monetize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="Matt"><p>You can edit the CSS on all themes.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow. Only a few years later&#8230; and at an expense! I heartily laugh at this lame-duck attempt to monetize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/#comment-31405</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/#comment-31405</guid>
		<description>Thanks Matt, I just went back to WordPress.com and saw the update on that... I think there are a few others of us out there that thought it was just the Sandbox theme, much like it was just Connections or whatnot when the header editor first came out.

I can't wait to see what you add next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Matt, I just went back to WordPress.com and saw the update on that&#8230; I think there are a few others of us out there that thought it was just the Sandbox theme, much like it was just Connections or whatnot when the header editor first came out.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see what you add next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erasable Ink</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/#comment-31404</link>
		<dc:creator>Erasable Ink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/#comment-31404</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;For $15 USD, I could get a domain name, and a month of hosting.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Make it $27 bucks, and you've got a domain and hosting for a year. For $2 you can get a domain at Yahoo (http://domains.yahoo.com/), and for $25 you can get a full &lt;em&gt;years&lt;/em&gt; worth of hosting at ASmallOrange (http://www.asmallorange.com/).

But honestly, as a WordPress.com user, I'm stoked about this update. $15 really is just couple rolls of pennies, and it lets you edit your CSS for a full year. Keep in mind, you get more at WordPress.com than just a blog; you get security. You can't mess anything up, and that's great for people like me. When I had my own server running WordPress, I accidentally edited some lines of code that I didn't understand, and had the entire site screw up. Back to a fresh install, and that can be time consuming.

You also get more social integration; you can browse through WordPress.com blogs, and you can meet people through WP.com forums. Its built-in stat system is great. WP.com is a perfectly optimized version of WordPress MU, that it's hard to think of a reason not to use it.

Basically what I'm saying is that I don't think there's too much concern over people not willing to pay. The people that use WP.com are different people than the ones that use WP.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For $15 USD, I could get a domain name, and a month of hosting.</p></blockquote>
<p>Make it $27 bucks, and you&#8217;ve got a domain and hosting for a year. For $2 you can get a domain at Yahoo (http://domains.yahoo.com/), and for $25 you can get a full <em>years</em> worth of hosting at ASmallOrange (http://www.asmallorange.com/).</p>
<p>But honestly, as a WordPress.com user, I&#8217;m stoked about this update. $15 really is just couple rolls of pennies, and it lets you edit your CSS for a full year. Keep in mind, you get more at WordPress.com than just a blog; you get security. You can&#8217;t mess anything up, and that&#8217;s great for people like me. When I had my own server running WordPress, I accidentally edited some lines of code that I didn&#8217;t understand, and had the entire site screw up. Back to a fresh install, and that can be time consuming.</p>
<p>You also get more social integration; you can browse through WordPress.com blogs, and you can meet people through WP.com forums. Its built-in stat system is great. WP.com is a perfectly optimized version of WordPress MU, that it&#8217;s hard to think of a reason not to use it.</p>
<p>Basically what I&#8217;m saying is that I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s too much concern over people not willing to pay. The people that use WP.com are different people than the ones that use WP.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/#comment-31400</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/04/wordpresscom-adds-custom-css/#comment-31400</guid>
		<description>You can edit the CSS on all themes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can edit the CSS on all themes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
