Comments on: WordPress Not Good for SEO? http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/ News, plugins and themes for blogging applications Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:42:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Все о Wordpress » Blog Archive » WordPress плох для SEO? http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/#comment-212182 Все о Wordpress » Blog Archive » WordPress плох для SEO? Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:13:49 +0000 http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/#comment-212182 [...] Оригинал статьи: WordPress Not Good for SEO? [...] [...] Оригинал статьи: WordPress Not Good for SEO? [...]

]]> By: Michael http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/#comment-212155 Michael Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:34:12 +0000 http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/#comment-212155 Although out of the box it isn't that great for SEO it takes about 5-10 minutes and one plugin to get it to be pretty darn good on the SEO front. By the way, what is better than WordPress for SEO that is still as easy as WordPress to install, modify, and use? Although out of the box it isn’t that great for SEO it takes about 5-10 minutes and one plugin to get it to be pretty darn good on the SEO front.

By the way, what is better than WordPress for SEO that is still as easy as WordPress to install, modify, and use?

]]> By: better gas mileage http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/#comment-212153 better gas mileage Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:27:13 +0000 http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/#comment-212153 [...] 15 percent,&quot the ...http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/daily-news/080314-120278/WordPress Not Good for SEO? Mark from 45n5.com has added a new video about his neverending dislike for the WordPress software. [...] [...] 15 percent,&quot the …http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/daily-news/080314-120278/WordPress Not Good for SEO? Mark from 45n5.com has added a new video about his neverending dislike for the WordPress software. [...]

]]> By: Stijn http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/#comment-212123 Stijn Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:29:21 +0000 http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/#comment-212123 Yes, you're right. It doesn't take very much to improve out-of-the-box SEO for WordPress. Install the All-in-one-seo plugin helps a lot, and make sure you limit spiders to not visit your double content with a robot.txt. Once you have these two areas covered, you're already halfway. (A good theme is another important option, but I leave that up to the user to decide.) Yes, you’re right. It doesn’t take very much to improve out-of-the-box SEO for WordPress. Install the All-in-one-seo plugin helps a lot, and make sure you limit spiders to not visit your double content with a robot.txt. Once you have these two areas covered, you’re already halfway. (A good theme is another important option, but I leave that up to the user to decide.)

]]> By: cmsdev http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/#comment-212122 cmsdev Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:51:57 +0000 http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/#comment-212122 I guess that SEO is never an out-of-the-box product. Regarding to your special interests you always have to "customize" any software you buy. That not depends on wordpress or whatever software you have to or want to use. I guess that SEO is never an out-of-the-box product. Regarding to your special interests you always have to “customize” any software you buy. That not depends on wordpress or whatever software you have to or want to use.

]]> By: Remarkablogger http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/#comment-212116 Remarkablogger Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:50:28 +0000 http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/08/wordpress-not-good-for-seo/#comment-212116 Mark's right, but your points are valid, too. What I'd like to see is great SEO out of the box in the first place. Unless you want to screw around with .htaccess files and the like, getting pretty permalinks on WordPress and dealing with duplicate content issues is WAY beyond many bloggers, more and more of whom are not that tech-savvy. And although Mark's points are correct, let's put things in context: compared to most DIY website jobs, WordPress is better SEO out of the box. Just do a search for "untitled document" and you'll see what I mean. Mark’s right, but your points are valid, too. What I’d like to see is great SEO out of the box in the first place. Unless you want to screw around with .htaccess files and the like, getting pretty permalinks on WordPress and dealing with duplicate content issues is WAY beyond many bloggers, more and more of whom are not that tech-savvy.

And although Mark’s points are correct, let’s put things in context: compared to most DIY website jobs, WordPress is better SEO out of the box. Just do a search for “untitled document” and you’ll see what I mean.

]]>