<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Performancing Blogger Hates WordPress 2.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/</link>
	<description>News, plugins and themes for blogging applications</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Han</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212385</link>
		<dc:creator>Han</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212385</guid>
		<description>I dont use any of the new features - are there any? I dont use that media thing. I type a post and click publish. The only thing I'm glad of is the updated admin interface - thats been a LONG time coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont use any of the new features - are there any? I dont use that media thing. I type a post and click publish. The only thing I&#8217;m glad of is the updated admin interface - thats been a LONG time coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212379</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212379</guid>
		<description>(Back again on FF2... sorry for the double post) If you're using WP as a normal platform for blogging, then 2.5.1 is probably suitable for you. All the major complaints I've heard and read about that I share, as well, come from the fact that this version is less user-friendly and less practical, in terms of using it as an advanced CMS (ie. your site's completely plugged in, you're running multiple sidebars and not just 2 or 3, and you have multiple authors with multiple roles on your site). I've actually reverted back to 2.3.3, because I've had so many complaints, too, on my own site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Back again on FF2&#8230; sorry for the double post) If you&#8217;re using WP as a normal platform for blogging, then 2.5.1 is probably suitable for you. All the major complaints I&#8217;ve heard and read about that I share, as well, come from the fact that this version is less user-friendly and less practical, in terms of using it as an advanced CMS (ie. your site&#8217;s completely plugged in, you&#8217;re running multiple sidebars and not just 2 or 3, and you have multiple authors with multiple roles on your site). I&#8217;ve actually reverted back to 2.3.3, because I&#8217;ve had so many complaints, too, on my own site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212378</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212378</guid>
		<description>IE 7 keeps crashing after a minute on this comment section. mind want to check that out if you recently upgraded</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE 7 keeps crashing after a minute on this comment section. mind want to check that out if you recently upgraded</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asi</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212376</link>
		<dc:creator>asi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212376</guid>
		<description>+

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Browser</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212375</link>
		<dc:creator>Browser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 08:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212375</guid>
		<description>You've an error in your site right corner.

Warning: main() [function.main]: php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Temporary failure in name resolution in /home/blogging/public_html/wp-content/themes/wp_bloggingpro/sidebar.php on line 66</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve an error in your site right corner.</p>
<p>Warning: main() [function.main]: php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Temporary failure in name resolution in /home/blogging/public_html/wp-content/themes/wp_bloggingpro/sidebar.php on line 66</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (jeff)isageek</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212218</link>
		<dc:creator>(jeff)isageek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212218</guid>
		<description>I couldnt disagree with him more.  I think it looks great and enhances the wordpress experience.   i can see where he is saying maybe they should have called it something like 3.0 but that is something little to me.

I upgraded to 2.5 and am staying there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldnt disagree with him more.  I think it looks great and enhances the wordpress experience.   i can see where he is saying maybe they should have called it something like 3.0 but that is something little to me.</p>
<p>I upgraded to 2.5 and am staying there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Hart</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212214</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212214</guid>
		<description>What are my thoughts?  My thoughts are the post makes him come off sounding like a pompous ass who will lose readers over his hissy fit.  There are things I don't like in the new version but there are things I don't like about every upgrade, except when i went from Windows Me to Win 2k.  There was nothing I didn't enjoy about that upgrade.

I think the biggest problem people are having whether they'll admit it or not is they hate the new new color scheme, even more than they hate the widget page.  The color scheme is easy enough to fix you can switch back to the classic in the user controls or like I did before I realized you could do that just crack open WP in Dreamweaver and edit the WP CSS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are my thoughts?  My thoughts are the post makes him come off sounding like a pompous ass who will lose readers over his hissy fit.  There are things I don&#8217;t like in the new version but there are things I don&#8217;t like about every upgrade, except when i went from Windows Me to Win 2k.  There was nothing I didn&#8217;t enjoy about that upgrade.</p>
<p>I think the biggest problem people are having whether they&#8217;ll admit it or not is they hate the new new color scheme, even more than they hate the widget page.  The color scheme is easy enough to fix you can switch back to the classic in the user controls or like I did before I realized you could do that just crack open WP in Dreamweaver and edit the WP CSS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miniblogs.lv - 5 minūšu blogs &#187; Lielajiem puikām arī nepatīk jaunākais wordpress</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212210</link>
		<dc:creator>miniblogs.lv - 5 minūšu blogs &#187; Lielajiem puikām arī nepatīk jaunākais wordpress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212210</guid>
		<description>[...] Performancing Blogger Hates WordPress 2.5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Performancing Blogger Hates WordPress 2.5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malte Landwehr</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212207</link>
		<dc:creator>Malte Landwehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212207</guid>
		<description>I don't like 2.5 either and totally agree with Ray. They changed way too much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like 2.5 either and totally agree with Ray. They changed way too much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212205</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/14/performancing-blogger-hates-wordpress-25/#comment-212205</guid>
		<description>I agree that it should've been version 3, but I think the software as a whole is an excellent improvement. I don't know if I am a power user or not; probably not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it should&#8217;ve been version 3, but I think the software as a whole is an excellent improvement. I don&#8217;t know if I am a power user or not; probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
