<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo and Automattic: Perfect Match?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/21/yahoo-and-automattic-perfect-match/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/21/yahoo-and-automattic-perfect-match/</link>
	<description>News, plugins and themes for blogging applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:23:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gordon R. Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/21/yahoo-and-automattic-perfect-match/comment-page-1/#comment-212346</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon R. Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/21/yahoo-and-automattic-perfect-match/#comment-212346</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it seems like Yahoo needs help in the blogging &amp; social networking areas, probably even if Microsoft buys them.

For a long time, I wondered why Yahoo didn&#039;t snatch up Xanga, which just a few years ago had a pretty popular blogging and social network platform.

Xanga&#039;s languished in the past couple of years, but seems to still be working on their site, adding features such as pulse, a Twitter-like component.

Now, it might make more sense for Yahoo to buy Automattic, since they&#039;ve got a lot more momentum and are working on networking features.

It is surprising, though, how Yahoo hasn&#039;t made more moves in this area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it seems like Yahoo needs help in the blogging &amp; social networking areas, probably even if Microsoft buys them.</p>
<p>For a long time, I wondered why Yahoo didn&#8217;t snatch up Xanga, which just a few years ago had a pretty popular blogging and social network platform.</p>
<p>Xanga&#8217;s languished in the past couple of years, but seems to still be working on their site, adding features such as pulse, a Twitter-like component.</p>
<p>Now, it might make more sense for Yahoo to buy Automattic, since they&#8217;ve got a lot more momentum and are working on networking features.</p>
<p>It is surprising, though, how Yahoo hasn&#8217;t made more moves in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Karr</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/21/yahoo-and-automattic-perfect-match/comment-page-1/#comment-212317</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/04/21/yahoo-and-automattic-perfect-match/#comment-212317</guid>
		<description>Please don&#039;t give them any ideas.  It seems Yahoo! has gotten about efficient as the government when it begins to &#039;takeover businesses&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t give them any ideas.  It seems Yahoo! has gotten about efficient as the government when it begins to &#8216;takeover businesses&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
