<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Cache or Not to Cache?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/</link>
	<description>News, plugins and themes for blogging applications</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: program</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-215424</link>
		<dc:creator>program</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-215424</guid>
		<description>However, one big disadvantage of caching is that essentially your site will be static, and any dynamic elements might not work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, one big disadvantage of caching is that essentially your site will be static, and any dynamic elements might not work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: programlar</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-215423</link>
		<dc:creator>programlar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-215423</guid>
		<description>Great! So caching plugins help make my site load faster AND it takes the heavy load off the server by minimizing PHP execution and database queries. However, one big disadvantage of caching is that essentially your site will be static, and any dynamic elements might not work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! So caching plugins help make my site load faster AND it takes the heavy load off the server by minimizing PHP execution and database queries. However, one big disadvantage of caching is that essentially your site will be static, and any dynamic elements might not work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rap</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-215415</link>
		<dc:creator>rap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-215415</guid>
		<description>Great! So caching plugins help make my site load faster AND it takes the heavy load off the server by minimizing PHP execution and database queries. However, one big disadvantage of caching is that essentially your site will be static, and any dynamic elements might not work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! So caching plugins help make my site load faster AND it takes the heavy load off the server by minimizing PHP execution and database queries. However, one big disadvantage of caching is that essentially your site will be static, and any dynamic elements might not work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-214617</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-214617</guid>
		<description>What is the best thing to do for this PHP code
cache = [true or false] - Cache the rss feed for faster load</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the best thing to do for this PHP code<br />
cache = [true or false] - Cache the rss feed for faster load</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turkrap</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-213953</link>
		<dc:creator>turkrap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-213953</guid>
		<description>This is going to sound a little negative</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to sound a little negative</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: youtube</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-213326</link>
		<dc:creator>youtube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-213326</guid>
		<description>Great! So caching plugins help make my site load faster AND it takes the heavy load off the server by minimizing PHP execution and database queries. However, one big disadvantage of caching is that essentially your site will be static, and any dynamic elements might not work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! So caching plugins help make my site load faster AND it takes the heavy load off the server by minimizing PHP execution and database queries. However, one big disadvantage of caching is that essentially your site will be static, and any dynamic elements might not work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-213244</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 06:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-213244</guid>
		<description>One problem (or feature??) is the amount of space my cache took. I had to increase the disk storage of my account to accommodate for the cache.

I guess it is great at times when the traffic hits a major high, however for regular traffic it isn't going to give you too much of a saving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One problem (or feature??) is the amount of space my cache took. I had to increase the disk storage of my account to accommodate for the cache.</p>
<p>I guess it is great at times when the traffic hits a major high, however for regular traffic it isn&#8217;t going to give you too much of a saving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Angelo Racoma</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-213157</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Angelo Racoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-213157</guid>
		<description>DMZ, I don't know if I intended it that way or not, but I did refer to any caching plugin in particular. I just stated that I wasn't sure if caching plugins _in general_ did this.

And if you need a specific answer, no - WP Super Cache doesn't support this, unless you use JavaScript to load those dynamic aspects of your site. I  read the documentation.

Cheers,

angelo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DMZ, I don&#8217;t know if I intended it that way or not, but I did refer to any caching plugin in particular. I just stated that I wasn&#8217;t sure if caching plugins _in general_ did this.</p>
<p>And if you need a specific answer, no - WP Super Cache doesn&#8217;t support this, unless you use JavaScript to load those dynamic aspects of your site. I  read the documentation.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>angelo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ameo</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-213156</link>
		<dc:creator>ameo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 08:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-213156</guid>
		<description>i thought about it actually sometimes but never went for it .
i'll try it now and see what happens . thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thought about it actually sometimes but never went for it .<br />
i&#8217;ll try it now and see what happens . thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web tasarım</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-213151</link>
		<dc:creator>web tasarım</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 02:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/05/07/to-cache-or-not-to-cache/#comment-213151</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
