<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could WordPress.org Benefit From A GitHub Similar Platform?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2009/12/09/could-wordpress-org-benefit-from-a-github-similar-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2009/12/09/could-wordpress-org-benefit-from-a-github-similar-platform/</link>
	<description>News, plugins and themes for blogging applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kubacki</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2009/12/09/could-wordpress-org-benefit-from-a-github-similar-platform/#comment-247966</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Kubacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 12:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/?p=3544#comment-247966</guid>
		<description>You have already mentioned the GPL issue. Because of it I for one have moved my plugin(s) to Github. But y that the auto-update is no longer available, as that is only supported for plugins hosted at WP.org.

WP.org plugin site lacks one thing badly: A proper issue tracker. For example, users experiencing problems with my plugin have published their issues at WP.org forums. As the author, I don&#039;t get automatically notified about that. Therefore that support requests don&#039;t get resolved in a timely manner.

Plus, WP.org is slow when accessed from Germany. Setting a stable version&#039;s number in &quot;readme.txt&quot; and copying &quot;trunk&quot; right after that is - counter-intuitive at least. You cannot publish sites with more documentation at WP.org - which is possible with Github. 

Finally, if someone unknown wants to contribute to your works you get a patch either per email or have to dig it up from WP.org&#039;s forums. Nope, that is definitely better implemented somewhere else. And GIT (or Mercurial, I am pragmatic here) the better tool for that kind of development than SVN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have already mentioned the GPL issue. Because of it I for one have moved my plugin(s) to Github. But y that the auto-update is no longer available, as that is only supported for plugins hosted at WP.org.</p>
<p>WP.org plugin site lacks one thing badly: A proper issue tracker. For example, users experiencing problems with my plugin have published their issues at WP.org forums. As the author, I don&#8217;t get automatically notified about that. Therefore that support requests don&#8217;t get resolved in a timely manner.</p>
<p>Plus, WP.org is slow when accessed from Germany. Setting a stable version&#8217;s number in &#8220;readme.txt&#8221; and copying &#8220;trunk&#8221; right after that is &#8211; counter-intuitive at least. You cannot publish sites with more documentation at WP.org &#8211; which is possible with Github. </p>
<p>Finally, if someone unknown wants to contribute to your works you get a patch either per email or have to dig it up from WP.org&#8217;s forums. Nope, that is definitely better implemented somewhere else. And GIT (or Mercurial, I am pragmatic here) the better tool for that kind of development than SVN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remkus de Vries</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2009/12/09/could-wordpress-org-benefit-from-a-github-similar-platform/#comment-229587</link>
		<dc:creator>Remkus de Vries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 08:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/?p=3544#comment-229587</guid>
		<description>I think it could. Not sure if it has to be GitHub necessarally, but this functionality is much needed in my opinion. There are way too many orphaned solutions out there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it could. Not sure if it has to be GitHub necessarally, but this functionality is much needed in my opinion. There are way too many orphaned solutions out there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

