<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the Right Blog Template Width?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2010/01/09/whats-the-right-blog-template-width/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2010/01/09/whats-the-right-blog-template-width/</link>
	<description>News, plugins and themes for blogging applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Shil1978</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2010/01/09/whats-the-right-blog-template-width/#comment-256142</link>
		<dc:creator>Shil1978</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/?p=4177#comment-256142</guid>
		<description>The ideal width has had me confused for a while now. I presently use 960 px for my Blogger site. Reading through this assures me a bit that what I am doing right now is the right thing. Thanks for writing this post - has helped me understand this topic a bit better!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ideal width has had me confused for a while now. I presently use 960 px for my Blogger site. Reading through this assures me a bit that what I am doing right now is the right thing. Thanks for writing this post &#8211; has helped me understand this topic a bit better!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiash</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2010/01/09/whats-the-right-blog-template-width/#comment-247613</link>
		<dc:creator>kiash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 04:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/?p=4177#comment-247613</guid>
		<description>I want to create 100% wide template for my site@</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to create 100% wide template for my site@</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franky Branckaute</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2010/01/09/whats-the-right-blog-template-width/#comment-225876</link>
		<dc:creator>Franky Branckaute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/?p=4177#comment-225876</guid>
		<description>I love how &lt;a href=&quot;http://duoh.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Duoh&lt;/a&gt; has visual details added for &#039;ridiculous wide displays&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how <a href="http://duoh.com/" rel="nofollow">Duoh</a> has visual details added for &#8216;ridiculous wide displays&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regnard Raquedan</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2010/01/09/whats-the-right-blog-template-width/#comment-225871</link>
		<dc:creator>Regnard Raquedan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/?p=4177#comment-225871</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to agree with that but with ridiculously wide displays, text just comes out as too wide... maybe we need to tweak the max-width CSS implementation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to agree with that but with ridiculously wide displays, text just comes out as too wide&#8230; maybe we need to tweak the max-width CSS implementation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regnard Raquedan</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2010/01/09/whats-the-right-blog-template-width/#comment-225870</link>
		<dc:creator>Regnard Raquedan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/?p=4177#comment-225870</guid>
		<description>Hey! I was really surprised that the numbers were near the rule of thumb. Maybe that&#039;s a case not to move outside the 960px width range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! I was really surprised that the numbers were near the rule of thumb. Maybe that&#8217;s a case not to move outside the 960px width range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Maude</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2010/01/09/whats-the-right-blog-template-width/#comment-225862</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Maude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/?p=4177#comment-225862</guid>
		<description>I use 960 px  but I like to include a 100% element for interest on larger monitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use 960 px  but I like to include a 100% element for interest on larger monitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2010/01/09/whats-the-right-blog-template-width/#comment-225579</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 01:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/?p=4177#comment-225579</guid>
		<description>I am of the firm believe that they should all be variable. Fixed width templates just make me annoyed. I agree that you should be able to set the width of a sidebar, but that the center (or primary) column should &quot;float&quot; and adjust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am of the firm believe that they should all be variable. Fixed width templates just make me annoyed. I agree that you should be able to set the width of a sidebar, but that the center (or primary) column should &#8220;float&#8221; and adjust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devolute</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2010/01/09/whats-the-right-blog-template-width/#comment-225560</link>
		<dc:creator>devolute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingpro.com/?p=4177#comment-225560</guid>
		<description>Of course, the W3C stats don&#039;t take into account who has their browser at full screen, who has it with some sort of toolbar off to the side, or whatever.  That said, I think keeping it a page in the 900-980 rang is sensible. With a mobile stylesheet as well, of course!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the W3C stats don&#8217;t take into account who has their browser at full screen, who has it with some sort of toolbar off to the side, or whatever.  That said, I think keeping it a page in the 900-980 rang is sensible. With a mobile stylesheet as well, of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

